CAD4466HK
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 2,867
Seems to be 308010GB/6800XT performance and you can only get it in a system build outside of China.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems to be 308010GB/6800XT performance and you can only get it in a system build outside of China.
AMD's
China-OnlyRadeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB Debuts: Navi 31 with Cut-Down Memory
EDIT:
During AMD’s presentation at China Joy in Shanghai, China, the much-anticipated Radeon RX 7900 GRE “Golden Rabbit Edition” was officially announced. This new graphics card is equipped with the Navi 31 GPU, which has slightly fewer cores compared to the 7900 XT models. It will be shipped with 16 GB of memory.
end EDIT
@wxnod has just published pictures of Sapphire's Radeon RX 7900 GRE
ScrubWiki revealed its specifications:
(China-exclusive)Radeon RX 7900 GRE is based on the Navi 31 GPU with53765120 stream processors enabled and running at1.501.2 GHz –2.402.2 GHz,which is the same configuration as that of the Radeon RX 7900 XT.
There is one important difference though. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE disables one more memory controller die (MCD) and therefore comes with 16GB of GDDR6 memory along with a 256-bit memory interface.
As a result, AMD's Radeon RX 7900 GREcan boast the same 32 FP32 TFLOPS – 51.6 FP32 TFLOPS (base – boost) compute horsepower as the Radeon RX 7900 XT, yetit only has 64MB of Infinity Cache (with bandwidth reduced to 2.56 GB/s) as well as 16GB of memory (with bandwidth reduced to 640 MB/s).
When it comes to Sapphire's Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900 GRE, this graphics board features two eight-pin auxiliary PCIe power connectors and is rated for around 300W thermal graphics power (TGP). To cool down the rather hot Navi 31 GRE GPU, Sapphire uses a rather large 2.5-wide triple-fan cooling system, which is considerably thinner than the company uses on its Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900 XT.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-radeon-rx-7900-gre-debuts
Is (possible) 5% more perf worth waiting a week or longer and paying $50 or more over what you got?Hmmm...
I literally just ordered a 7800 XT (Powercolor Hellhound for $500) for my wife.
Worth waiting to see if the GRE cards land at $550 by next week?
Hmmm...
I literally just ordered a 7800 XT (Powercolor Hellhound for $500) for my wife.
Worth waiting to see if the GRE cards land at $550 by next week?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3o4sZklnJo
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8onGBVWxg1k
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brOSJF9eonw
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-gre-pulse/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-rx-7900-gre-nitro/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asrock-radeon-rx-7900-gre-steel-legend/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-gre-pure/
This was actually a laptop GPU just like the 6500 xt. That is why it feels so odd.If the ratio of XT and XTX at launch was worrisome, this seem to be pointing to some issue, which I am not sure I get...
This is 80 CU of the best gaming GPU AMD ever made, does it beat a small 4070 super........ a little bit and sell for $550 locking the frequency down to not mess up the product stack too much.
Just a big plus and nice for the customer too, but I doubt that was planned.
This seem to have better fps per dollars at $550 MSRP (if they exist) than a 7800xt, when better performance cost less it is always a good deal in how those market usually goes.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Graphics Cards Review Roundup
https://videocardz.com/174241/amd-radeon-rx-7900-gre-graphics-cards-review-roundup
+7.5% at 1440p, +6% at 4k on the techpowerup set of titles.... +5% in min fpsthe RX 7900 GRE absolutely destroys the RX 6900 XT in both efficiency and performance,
Really don't know why the $500 - $600 range needs so much overlap. Why - so we can play some poorly coded AAA title at 1080p?Did... Did we need this?
While I agree that some games aren't well optimised, there ARE "medium" settings for a reason. If a 2024 game's "Medium" looks as good as a 2020 games "Ultra", it makes sense that it would run the same, Right?Really don't know why the $500 - $600 range needs so much overlap. Why - so we can play some poorly coded AAA title at 1080p?
What we need is a 7700 non-xt for around $350 with both 7600 cards dropping $30 or so.
It's time game developers work again to match the hardware most have while still being impressive instead of GPU makers trying to keep up with their poorly developed trash.
I encourage you to watch 5he DF review of Skull and Bones. 720p native for PS5 in 'Performance' mode. It's getting REALLY bad.While I agree that some games aren't well optimised, there ARE "medium" settings for a reason. If a 2024 game's "Medium" looks as good as a 2020 games "Ultra", it makes sense that it would run the same, Right?
But more importantly, I agree that We need more sub $300 cards. I swear, we're getting pinky-nail sized silicon with a 32bit memory bus and a PCB thinner than paper being sold as a "X060 Ti OC BLACK EDITION" for $500+
Like silicon area and memory interface has more in common with a GT1030.
Seems to be 308010GB/6800XT performance and you can only get it in a system build outside of China.
Not in the summer of 2023 (msrp of 7900xtx-xt were quite high in china), it is around $550 now for the US launch, at least that should be the starting price.7900 GRE for $650 is a joke.
I'm not exactly hurt about a terrible game being terribly optimised. All of the games that are great, generation-defining hall-of-fame status are usually a bit more frustrating when they don't optimise well, but also, its more rare for a genuinely good game to be terribly optimised.I encourage you to watch 5he DF review of Skull and Bones. 720p native for PS5 in 'Performance' mode. It's getting REALLY bad.
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Graphics Cards Review Roundup
https://videocardz.com/174241/amd-radeon-rx-7900-gre-graphics-cards-review-roundup
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3o4sZklnJo
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8onGBVWxg1k
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brOSJF9eonw
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-gre-pulse/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-rx-7900-gre-nitro/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asrock-radeon-rx-7900-gre-steel-legend/
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-gre-pure/
Is (possible) 5% more perf worth waiting a week or longer and paying $50 or more over what you got?
When the conscientious is +10% then yes.Is (possible) 5% more perf worth waiting a week or longer and paying $50 or more over what you got?
7700 XT was $350, 2 or 3 weeks ago:Really don't know why the $500 - $600 range needs so much overlap. Why - so we can play some poorly coded AAA title at 1080p?
What we need is a 7700 non-xt for around $350 with both 7600 cards dropping $30 or so.
It's time game developers work again to match the hardware most have while still being impressive instead of GPU makers trying to keep up with their poorly developed trash.
Pricing this gen seems to have been a function of stocks of previous gen cards remaining on shelves.7700 XT was $350, 2 or 3 weeks ago:
https://www.techpowerup.com/318865/...5-threatening-rtx-4060-ti-and-rx-7600-xt?cp=3
On reflection then, the RX 7900 GRE isn't necessarily a bad product, but it's not a particularly great one either.
If the RX 7900 GRE restored a $100 price differential between itself and the 4070 Super, then it would instantly look a lot more attractive. As things stand, I imagine most buyers would be happy paying a $50 premium for the RTX 4070 Super given its aforementioned advantages.
https://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/dominic-moass/amd-rx-7900-gre-review/39/
From the TPU summary charts, it actually looks more like +10% performance for +10% more money.