Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PS5/XSX port memory leaksWhat in gods name do you need with that much ram in a desktop... Server yes desktop no.
ahhh good old emulationPS5/XSX port memory leaks
What in gods name do you need with that much ram in a desktop... Server yes desktop no.
4x DDR5 DIMMs isn't a picnic for anyone. You can do it on the Intel side but you'll have to run the RAM at lower clocks than you would with just two DIMMs. The difference is significant on that as well.Yeah it is no picnic on the AM5 side - I can't speak to Intel this gen.
I adopted AM5 early so I focused on higher density in two DIMMS due to four DIMM issues. So I have 2x32GB DDR5-6000 standardized across my rigs.
Honestly I have a dedicated ProxMox Server for thisMore than a handful of Chrome tabs open! ;-)
LOL the proverbial question! Workstation duties not typical desktop roles. Miss HEDT and server boards fill the role but $$$ and rather long boot times, etc.
Virtualization, simulation, LOVES RAM!
I have a Macbook Pro with 96GB too. My 64GB one was hitting limits.
I'd love to have 4-8TB or more memory. Things just run great in RAM. And too, the security of having *everything* diskless. A power cycle kills everything forever! ;-)
No, it really hasn't. With overclocking records, perhaps but generally speaking this has only been a problem in the DDR4 era. It's also more of an issue with AMD systems than Intel CPU based systems. Now, as chip density increases speeds tend to suffer in that its hard to find 32GB modules that can clock like 16GB modules, etc. But beyond that, breaking DDR4 4000MHz+ using 4x DIMMs on Intel systems is not really a big deal. I've done it plenty of times on 9900K's, etc.I get it, always been the case
In most cases, this would be a very bad trade where desktops are concerned. In fact, dropping below 3200MHz is pretty awful on desktops with DDR4. After 3200MHz you hit diminishing returns pretty quickly. This is also a goal post that moves over time as RAM speeds increased and with newer software. At one time 2666MHz was the sweet spot for DDR4 for cost and performance but it's moved to 3200MHz over the years. This changes as memory controllers improve, processor architectures change, etc.but I'd run (in the case of DDR4) 2100 over 3600 if that meant 128GB vs 64, for example.
Once you are swapping the performance differences of 3200 vs. 2100 is moot.
True but remember we need as much memory as possible!That's not going to happen with most desktop workloads.
you sure 192GB is enough to play MS Minesweeper?I see these 48GB DIMMs are on the market and not too expensive.
Has anyone actually gotten four to work on a Z790 board?
It seems this is more AM5 territory but there have been issues as well.
Yes and believe it or not alongside hearts and solitaire too! At the same time!you sure 192GB is enough to play MS Minesweeper?
Yes and believe it or not alongside hearts and solitaire too! At the same time!
Yeah the number doesn’t sit well with me for some illogical reason.Funny how the ram maxes out at 192GB. My retro pc maxes out at 192mb of RAM.
I thought it was to cater to the higher Intel memory clocks. 48GB ultra speeds. AMD RAM isn't in that discussion (differant arch) and currently happy at much lower speeds.I see these 48GB DIMMs are on the market and not too expensive.
Has anyone actually gotten four to work on a Z790 board?
It seems this is more AM5 territory but there have been issues as well.
https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-age...5-platform-8000-mt-s-teased-on-223-b650-boardI thought it was to cater to the higher Intel memory clocks. 48GB ultra speeds. AMD RAM isn't in that discussion (differant arch) and currently happy at much lower speeds.
Watched some guys show yesterday. He said there was some sort of divider or such memory setting that severely limits the 8000 memory performance. In his tests 6000 speed RAM was superior.https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-age...5-platform-8000-mt-s-teased-on-223-b650-board
Running this now on my ASRock X670E Taichi. DDR5-8000 and DDR5-8200 in the article. I'm just running 64GB DDR5-6000 and I haven't tried anything but they spent weeks focusing on memory speeds alone wtihin the AMD engineering dept.
Nevermind I see there are two components: 192GB AND high speed. Which I have not seen on the AMD side, yet. Either way - progress is being made with RAM and AM5.
6000 is the best bet right now for AMD or Intel IMHO, the crazy 7-8 kits are nice but for the costs and real world difference it's hard to justify IMO.Watched some guys show yesterday. He said there was some sort of divider or such memory setting that severely limits the 8000 memory performance. In his tests 6000 speed RAM was superior.
Agreed somewhat as costs aside it has been how Intel held the crown atm. Yes it is a lot of cost and you need the skills, but a benchmark sells a 1000 CPU/GPU's right?6000 is the best bet right now for AMD or Intel IMHO, the crazy 7-8 kits are nice but for the costs and real world difference it's hard to justify IMO.
bought asus x670e proart creator wifi today and i heard a lot bad reviews of asus mb so i decide to update bio before the build(so dumb).6000 is the best bet right now for AMD or Intel IMHO, the crazy 7-8 kits are nice but for the costs and real world difference it's hard to justify IMO.