fightingfi
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,231
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe someone should do a front page article on this...
But will it play crysis?
Interesting that they don't seem to be using an established CPU core.
But will it play crysis?
you say that like its a bad thing
Still waiting for the clockless CPU.
Maybe he's just referring to a fully static CPU that can run down to 0Hz or at any other clock rate up until its rated maximum? Most embedded CPUs have this property. Basically totally flexible clock scaling capabilities, though modern desktop/mobile CPUs are pretty strong here already, and relaxing the static requirement offers performance gains.So if it were clockless.. would it then theoretically be infinitely fast?
Like... speed of L1, L2, L3 cache, integer part of CPU, FPU part of CPU, etc.
Still waiting for the clockless CPU.
So if it were clockless.. would it then theoretically be infinitely fast?
I'm not sure if you were being a smart ass or not, but a clockless logic circuit just simply won't work. There has to be a clock input somewhere for it to work.
I see what you did there....
100 is 4 in binary, right?
i already have one...
100 is 4 in binary, right?
i already have one...
you are practically and theoretically bound by the smallest quantum of time that can exist. something about plancks constant or something. and also, if u dont have some ratio between all of the given things you mentioned, there will be increased latency. if i throw a ball in a straight line five times a second at a hole that passes by two times a second, the ball wouldnt line up with the hole and id have it bounce back or be lostSo if it were clockless.. would it then theoretically be infinitely fast?
You are going to have to have something based on something other than transistors in order to even try to accomplish that.
It would be very nice to not have to deal with multipliers though.... a system that allows a lot smaller adjustments than what is available now. Full and even half multipliers kinda anger me sometimes.
Also being able to adjust the speed of different things withought affecting the speed of other things would be way nice as well...
Like... speed of L1, L2, L3 cache, integer part of CPU, FPU part of CPU, etc.
you are practically and theoretically bound by the smallest quantum of time that can exist. something about plancks constant or something. and also, if u dont have some ratio between all of the given things you mentioned, there will be increased latency. if i throw a ball in a straight line five times a second at a hole that passes by two times a second, the ball wouldnt line up with the hole and id have it bounce back or be lost
Meh, I only have a 10.
Can you say waste of money because no current program/os utilizes all of those cores?
So you're only 1 core away! (100 is 3)
When you guys and gals talk about performance with this 100 core CPU, please realize that each core will be slow compared to today's cpu cores. This is the same with the intel 80 core chip we that was announced last year. Every core of the Intel chip was less than 1/2 the power of a low end atom core. This type of cpu would be good for some very specific problems but definitely not good for a general purpose machine.
100 is 4 in binary
I'm not sure if you were being a smart ass or not, but a clockless logic circuit just simply won't work. There has to be a clock input somewhere for it to work.