AMD Radeon RX 460 numbers

cageymaru

cageymaru

Fully [H]
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
22,130
AMD Radeon RX 460 numbers.
AMD Radeon RX 460 Gets Single and Crossfire 3DMark 11 Benchmarks - The Super Affordable 'Budget Gaming' Graphics Card

Low end has a new champion it seems.

RX-460-3D-Mark-11.png



RX-460-CrossFire-3DMark-11.png
 
The crossfire score is a pretty bad value. You'd be better off with a 470 ;). But single-card beats a 750 TI which is currently low-end champ.
 
Quix said:
The crossfire score is a pretty bad value. You'd be better off with a 470 ;). But single-card beats a 750 TI which is currently low-end champ.
Click to expand...
Well, if a single rx460 was not beating a single r7 360, it would be a fail of epic proportions in SKU naming.
 
Quix said:
The crossfire score is a pretty bad value. You'd be better off with a 470 ;). But single-card beats a 750 TI which is currently low-end champ.
Click to expand...

I'd argue that it now has to beat the GTX 950, which also has a version out that runs on PCI-E power only.

lolfail9001 said:
Well, if a single rx460 was not beating a single r7 360, it would be a fail of epic proportions in SKU naming.
Click to expand...

AMD messed this up a little with the low-end of the 300 series. I don't recall exactly, but I think the 265 was rebadged as the 370.
 
Daniel_Chang said:
I'd argue that it now has to beat the GTX 950, which also has a version out that runs on PCI-E power only.



AMD messed this up a little with the low-end of the 300 series. I don't recall exactly, but I think the 265 was rebadged as the 370.
Click to expand...

The mini 950 needs a price drop then. It's msrp is still sitting at $150, while the 460 starts at $100.
 
jbc029 said:
The mini 950 needs a price drop then. It's msrp is still sitting at $150, while the 460 starts at $100.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I may have misunderstood Quix's post. I was going off performance and failed to consider price bracket. You're correct. Still, I do expect the 460 to compete with the 950 in performance. The first Polaris GPU shown off was matching a 950 in performance while running at an alleged 40-45W. This was either a 460, or a grossly underpowered and underclocked P10 engineering sample.
 
i would say theres a market for people just wanting to use extra displays hooked up or just needing a low powered card for whatever.....and in those cases amd did not have a competitive card at all. I think AMD is finally getting their act together;)...as to weather people will choose it over a 60 dollar 750 is a good question.
 
I don't game much these days, what little I do is usually on an old 720p monitor or my 1080p projector. While the games I play most often are older and well suited to my 6570 it's just too slow to run the few newer games I like. As these are easy to run titles, Trine 2, Alien Isolation, bioshock infinite etc a sub-100 dollar card like the 460, that's got better performance than a radeon 7850 would be an easy shoe in as my next card.
 
I brought up form factor the other day but the post got no attention.

if AMD can fit the 460 into a low profile design, they will have the fastest low-profile card on the market, and imo would get a lot of people to upgrade their HTPCs or Office PCs. The 750ti and 250 were the last low profile cards released, and are 2+ generations old at this point.
 
Combine the 460 with a Zen APU and some better multi gpu usage could make for a rather low cost but worthwhile gaming machine. Also dual graphics P11 and Zen APU for the mobile market will be interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top