Yea, let's compare similar performing LCD and OLED displays, the Samsung Neo G8 and the Dell AW3225QF.
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/samsung/odyssey-neo-g8-s32bg85
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/dell/alienware-aw3225qf
The LCD has noticeably worse scores in:
Worse Response...
More like: "Golf GTI, the death knell of Honda Civic SI's" :)
Dont get me wrong, LCDs can still exist. But they have to be cheaper because they perform worse.
If a 4k/240hz OLED costs $900, like the MSI model, then an equivalent LCD should cost $600.
New Blue PHOLED will solve burn-in for good apparently. Also, what is that "something"? This "something" will need to be better at what OLED already does, while not costing significantly more.
Can you try making a custom resolution for 2560x1440@360hz, please? The monitor should have enough bandwidth to handle this.
Also, how does the monitor scale 1920x1080 and 1280x720 in 4k/240hz mode? Is it sharp like the 1080p/480hz mode?
In my experience, VRR flicker mostly happens on menus/loading screens where the frames can radically vary, specially in solid color backgrounds. I've never seen it happening in actual gameplay. It might be more noticeable on OLEDs but it also happens on LCDs, I notice it big time on my Odyssey...
Sharing settings/icc profiles is useless because each panel is individually calibrated at the factory, so it will never look the same just by sharing settings.
Most never go back to LCD. It's impossible to accept the poor uniformity and bad viewing angles once you see an OLED. All high-end monitors coming out this year are OLEDs, so anyone who needs a high performer will need to get an OLED, I have yet to see a comparable LCD offering.
The only group...
This is the first OLED of its kind to offer adjustable BFI, up to half of the total refresh (240hz).
Adjustable BFI@240hz means it's possible to reach the same Pixel Blur Persistence as the maximum refresh. At 240hz pixel persistence is around 4.2ms, but because OLEDs have perfect response...