The lower your peak nits is the lower your color volume.
As I understand it, any time you use dynamic tone mapping (or HLG tonemapping and diverge from the static scale, which can do with HLG since it is is relative brightness),
rather than PQ...
Something like 160-180 Hz would probably be enough headroom for people like me who mainly play AAA single player titles. The only games in the past few years that I've played where 200+ fps were a reality were Doom Eternal and some Like A Dragon...
That might be it, but this is how I understood it:
It reserves that energize amount / reserved brightness amount. The wear-evening buffer.
It actually does that bright line during the wear-evening process and burns all of the emitters DOWN...
That's been the overall problem with FALD though. Not so bad in TVs, but on the monitor side. I wouldn't mind if I had my pick of OLED vs FALD monitors in the 1000-1500 euro range, but it gets hard to justify that a FALD is worth 3000+ euros.
Was able to get the Multi View working but it seems to require disabling Game Mode which also seem to break 4:4:4 which basically makes it pointless for anything text related (at least compared to an actual monitor).
I'm knocking on wood because so far I've avoided the dead pixels completely, along with burn-in. Still hoping it lasts until something in the 50-55" size comes out that is an actual improvement. Brighter HDR, higher refresh rate would do it for...
Meh. Hard to see, but it does possibly look a bit better?
I'm in the same boat as you. I have a pretty high hour count on my CX and have been using it without ASBL for probably a couple of years now with OLED light set to 30 unless in HDR. There...
Update!
Not really any difference to be honest. Maybe it's a little more blurry but I'm not positive on that.
Camera angle is a little different but when zooming I am able to make out the same things.
OLD:
NEW:
BONUS, hp bars on green ...
My take on the whole glossy vs matte is that I don't care as long as matte coating is not the awfully grainy type seen on some displays. I don't mind the one on my dual Samsung G70A 4K 28" IPS displays.
All the other stuff are going to be more...
Absolutely. 8K would be better off marketed and designed for e.g programmers, stock traders, people managing a ton of different Excels and so on who need a lot of desktop space for work, and would probably pay for the right product, say a 55-65"...
I'd go for it. I'm thinking it's what the manual option is for. That said, we don't know how much runway the display actually has left as you indicate. It might not work. And of course, you should only do what you're comfortable doing.
I would expect the 5000 series to silently upgrade the HDMI capabilities to match the 7900 XTX, maybe with a full speed DP 2.1 port unless Nvidia decides to nickel and dime us again.
I expect the answer to the second question is no. Samsung is...
Yeah I'd probably just try running the pixel refresher manually and hopefully it will get rid of current burn-in instead of waiting for it to have lingered there for longer. Extra 1000h is quite a bit of time after all.