Recent content by LukeTbk

aaaaaaaa got it...

Did those board had a bios flashback button and did you try to install the updated bios with it first ? https://www.asrock.com/support/QA/FlashbackSOP.pdf You do not need to have an installed CPU normally, let alone the current bios having any support for it.

The Amazon one during the primes days can get really cheap for the hardware, easy to "sideload" app on them. If it need for Windows on ARM to be good enough for it to work, it is a big risk, Qualcoom seem to have a list of issues going on. You can execute really well and still loose, Windows...

I read to me the: Even without it some boards let you update at BIOS boot without compatible CPU as CPU is just need for basic use (needs to be pin and electronically compatible). Flashback works without even need for a CPU in it as you don't need to switch on the system. Is exactly what I am...

Betting on fusion, by investing in it, doing R&D yourself, is all a bit of the same, those giants company tend to be the only looking very far ahead (most of other companies just try to survive). https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RW1fApf Look at the crazy stuff google...

It is somewhat common for motherboard to have their own memory-compute strong enough to do a BIOS update without a CPU or ram in the board just need power, almost all AM5 motherboard support it. You can look for bios flashback support or other naming with bios flash in them

The company doing nuclear fusion work, quantum computer and openAI is all about short term profit an underestimating the future is a really strange position... what's often less talked about is how much further ahead Microsoft would be if Satya Nadella They would be 4 billions company if they...

If they changed the precision of the AI model used for the simulation being run, they wrote it so small below the low res image that I am not even able to read it

Why say it is undocumented: https://opensource.apple.com/source/clang/clang-318.0.45/src/test/MC/ARM/arm-memory-instructions.s.auto.html Clang seem to support them and yhou do not need special library that take advantage of, something like that: char a,b,c; c = a+b; if(c<0) { } could use it...

Why would they ever remove said instruction, it seem to be a very small set of extra one. Even if we do not use any apple library (say a pure STL C project, nothing custom to MacOS), the compilers that target Apple Silicon could use those extra instruction, no ?

Chatgpt cannot run on your personnal hardware, they have over 200 billions weights (maybe in the trillion now) models running on supercomputer. The app are only on apple at first I think (and will use Internet to talk with a server), not sure if they are available to everyone yet. On your...

But why would they mind even at all if their binary run on other platform ? It is not like it is uncommon (that why people usually care about open source after all, how often you better compile specifically for your target...)

I did read like if it was about them adding stuff than the other would not be able to run anymore so people must buy their hardware to run their software, not for them to remove from themselve the ability to run application library. I was wrong rereading it, I guess it would change for people...

Would it be more if they get the same cooling, are they to the point that it does not even matter anymore ?

Didn't apple do this ? Not big but a short list of new custom instructions https://opensource.apple.com/source/clang/clang-318.0.45/src/test/MC/ARM/arm-memory-instructions.s.auto.html https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/writing-arm64-code-for-apple-platforms Apple platforms diverge...